Why does the media give attention to the Democrat candidates, including hours of prime time television coverage of their debates, like the one last evening December 19, 2019, when the Democrat party identifies with only 31% of voters? Easy answer. Over many, many, years, voters have been duped into believing that the two major political parties are a constitutional requirement of the election process. If so, where is that shown?
Political parties are “private” non-governmental groups of like-minded voters. The method by which they select and endorse candidates and issues is their business, and only theirs. ANY taxpayer funds expended solely for the benefit of any political party, or voter group, using a public resources, are unconstitutional.
If a political party has a closed primary, using public facilities that must be available to any political party, the public election costs thereof must be reimbursed 100%.
State election laws that place unreasonable qualifications or other barriers in the lawful conduct of any political party or voter group are unconstitutional. Unreasonable is defined to the understanding of voters, not the state
And last, the identification and placement of the legal name of a political party on a candidate or issue ballot line, or other governmental material, pertaining to any open election is unconstitutional.
My opinion.